- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X7.2 vs X9.2
Lamax X7.2 vs Lamax X9.2
What X7.2 does better (0) and where X9.2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X7.2X9.2
| X7.2 | X9.2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 44 mm | 44 mm | = |
| Width | 60 mm | 60 mm | = |
| Depth | 33 mm | 33 mm | = |
| Weight | 65 g | 65 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X7.2 better than X9.2?
X7.2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is X9.2 better than X7.2?
- 4K frame rate (max)30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 240 fps2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 65 g | 65 g |
| Width | 60 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 44 mm | 44 mm |
| Depth | 33 mm | 33 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 240 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Front screen size | — | 1.3″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | 128 GB | 128 GB |
