- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X7.2 vs SJ8 Dual Screen
Lamax X7.2 vs SJCAM SJ8 Dual Screen
What X7.2 does better (2) and where SJ8 Dual Screen wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Video2.6
5.9Battery6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
X7.2SJ8 Dual Screen
| X7.2 | SJ8 Dual Screen | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 44 mm | 41 mm | +3 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 62.5 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Depth | 33 mm | 28.8 mm | +4.2 mm |
| Weight | 65 g | 80 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X7.2 better than SJ8 Dual Screen?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 30 fps4×
- Weight65 g vs 80 g+23%
Why is SJ8 Dual Screen better than X7.2?
- Photo resolution16 MP vs 20 MP+26%
- Main screen size2″ vs 2.33″+17%
- Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 1,200 mAh+14%
- Depth33 mm vs 28.8 mm+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 65 g | 80 g |
| Width | 60 mm | 62.5 mm |
| Height | 44 mm | 41 mm |
| Depth | 33 mm | 28.8 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | — |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 30 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/2.8" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.36″ |
| Photo resolution | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/1.6 |
| Max field of view | — | 127° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2.33″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 1,200 mAh |
| Battery energy | — | 4.6 Wh |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | 128 GB | 128 GB |
