- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X9.2 vs 9S Plus
Lamax X9.2 vs Rollei 9S Plus
What X9.2 does better (5) and where 9S Plus wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9.29S Plus
| X9.2 | 9S Plus | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 44 mm | 43.8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 65.5 mm | −5.5 mm |
| Depth | 33 mm | 26.5 mm | +6.5 mm |
| Weight | 65 g | 129 g | −64 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9.2 better than 9S Plus?
- Weight65 g vs 129 g+98%
- Battery life (recording)120 min vs 85 min+41%
- Photo resolution16 MP vs 9 MP+88%
- Waterproof with housing40 m vs 10 m4×
- Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+5%
Why is 9S Plus better than X9.2?
- Depth33 mm vs 26.5 mm+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 65 g | 129 g |
| Width | 60 mm | 65.5 mm |
| Height | 44 mm | 43.8 mm |
| Depth | 33 mm | 26.5 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 10 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 240 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.4″ |
| Photo resolution | 16 MP | 9 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Front screen size | 1.3″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | 85 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | 128 GB | — |
