- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X9.2 vs SJ4000 AIR
Lamax X9.2 vs SJCAM SJ4000 AIR
What X9.2 does better (4) and where SJ4000 AIR wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Video4.9
4.2Ruggedness4.2
5.9Battery4.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9.2SJ4000 AIR
| X9.2 | SJ4000 AIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 44 mm | 41 mm | +3 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 59 mm | +1 mm |
| Depth | 33 mm | 30 mm | +3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9.2 better than SJ4000 AIR?
- 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Battery life (recording)120 min vs 90 min+33%
- Waterproof with housing40 m vs 30 m+33%
Why is SJ4000 AIR better than X9.2?
- Depth33 mm vs 30 mm+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 65 g | — |
| Width | 60 mm | 59 mm |
| Height | 44 mm | 41 mm |
| Depth | 33 mm | 30 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Max field of view | — | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Front screen size | 1.3″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | 90 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | 128 GB | — |
