LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 867Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. X9.2 vs GA300

Lamax X9.2 vs WOLFANG GA300

What X9.2 does better (1) and where GA300 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Lamax X9.2
Lamax · 2022X9.2
6.8Score
1 advantage≈ $120
vs
WOLFANG GA300
WOLFANG · 2022GA300
6.9Score
2 advantages≈ $70
Higher score
8.0Video6.4
4.2Ruggedness4.2

Why is X9.2 better than GA300?

  1. Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 60 fps4×

Why is GA300 better than X9.2?

  1. Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 1,350 mAh+29%
  2. Photo resolution16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Lamax X9.2Lamax X9.2≈ $1206.8
WOLFANG GA300WOLFANG GA300≈ $706.9
Design & durability
Weight65 g—
Width60 mm—
Height44 mm—
Depth33 mm—
Waterproof without case0 m0 m
Waterproof with housing40 m40 m
Video
Max video resolution4K4K
4K frame rate (max)60 fps60 fps
Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps60 fps
Timelapse / hyperlapseYesYes
Sensor & photo
Photo resolution16 MP20 MP
Max field of view—170°
Stabilisation
Stabilisation systemElektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS)6-Achsen Stabilisation
Electronic image stabilisationYesYes
Screens
Front screenYes—
Main screen size2″2″
Front screen size1.3″—
TouchscreenYesYes
Audio
External microphone supportYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity1,050 mAh1,350 mAh
Battery life (recording)120 min—
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
Storage & features
microSD card slotYesYes
Max memory card128 GB—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare