- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AT-M82TR 6K vs 4K DIVE
Lipa AT-M82TR 6K vs Nilox 4K DIVE
What AT-M82TR 6K does better (4) and where 4K DIVE wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Video6.4
9.8Photo3.3
4.2Ruggedness8.1
Why is AT-M82TR 6K better than 4K DIVE?
- Max video resolution6K vs 4K
- Photo resolution50 MP vs 4 MP12.5×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Battery capacity1,350 mAh vs 900 mAh+50%
Why is 4K DIVE better than AT-M82TR 6K?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 10 m
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 300 g | — |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 10 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 6K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 50 MP | 4 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | — | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | 900 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
