- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AT-M82TR 6K vs C400 Pro
Lipa AT-M82TR 6K vs SJCAM C400 Pro
What AT-M82TR 6K does better (5) and where C400 Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Video5.6
9.8Photo8.9
4.2Ruggedness6.3
5.6Battery6.8
Why is AT-M82TR 6K better than C400 Pro?
- Max video resolution6K vs 4K
- 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Photo resolution50 MP vs 24 MP2.1×
- Battery capacity1,350 mAh vs 1,250 mAh+8%
- Max field of view170° vs 160°+6%
Why is C400 Pro better than AT-M82TR 6K?
- Weight300 g vs 189 g+59%
- Battery life (recording)90 min vs 120 min+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 300 g | 189 g |
| Width | — | 68 mm |
| Height | — | 32 mm |
| Depth | — | 25.5 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 30 m |
| Min operating temperature | — | -10 °C |
| Max operating temperature | — | 40 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 6K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/1.8" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.56″ |
| Photo resolution | 50 MP | 24 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/1.9 |
| Max field of view | 170° | 160° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | SteadyMotion V2.0 |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | — | 2.29″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Direct wireless mic connection | — | Yes |
| External microphone support | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | 1,250 mAh |
| Battery energy | — | 4.8 Wh |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Live streaming | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 512 GB |
| Voice control | — | Yes |
