- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AT-M82TR 6K vs SF630
Lipa AT-M82TR 6K vs Surfola SF630
What AT-M82TR 6K does better (3) and where SF630 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Video6.4
4.2Ruggedness8.1
5.6Battery5.6
Why is AT-M82TR 6K better than SF630?
- Max video resolution6K vs 4K
- Photo resolution50 MP vs 24 MP2.1×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 60 fps2×
Why is SF630 better than AT-M82TR 6K?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 10 m
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 300 g | — |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 10 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 6K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 50 MP | 24 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | 6-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | — | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | 1,350 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | 90 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
