- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AT-M82TR 6K vs S7 Pro Max
Lipa AT-M82TR 6K vs XTU S7 Pro Max
What AT-M82TR 6K does better (4) and where S7 Pro Max wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Video6.8
9.8Photo9.6
Why is AT-M82TR 6K better than S7 Pro Max?
- Max video resolution6K vs 4K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 50 fps2.4×
- 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 50 fps+20%
- Max field of view170° vs 158°+8%
Why is S7 Pro Max better than AT-M82TR 6K?
S7 Pro Max has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 300 g | — |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | — |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Magnetic quick-release mount | — | Yes |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 6K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 50 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 50 fps |
| Log colour profile | — | Yes |
| HDR video | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/1.28" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.78″ |
| Photo resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | 158° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Super EIS 5.0 |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| 360° horizon lock | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
