- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD vs 4K DIVE
Lipa AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD vs Nilox 4K DIVE
What AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD does better (2) and where 4K DIVE wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Video6.4
4.2Ruggedness8.1
Why is AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD better than 4K DIVE?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 60 fps4×
- Photo resolution24 MP vs 4 MP6×
Why is 4K DIVE better than AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 10 m
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 100 g | — |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 10 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 60 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 24 MP | 4 MP |
| Max field of view | — | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 900 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
