- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD vs SL3 4K
Lipa AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD vs Patona SL3 4K
What AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD does better (2) and where SL3 4K wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Video7.3
4.2Ruggedness9.6
Why is AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD better than SL3 4K?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Photo resolution24 MP vs 16 MP+50%
Why is SL3 4K better than AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 30 m
- Main screen size2″ vs 3″+50%
- Battery capacity900 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 100 g | — |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 30 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 24 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Max field of view | — | 140° |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 3″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 90 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
