- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD vs DV800
Lipa AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD vs Prixton DV800
What AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD does better (0) and where DV800 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Video9.4
4.2Ruggedness9.6
Why is AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD better than DV800?
AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is DV800 better than AT-Q1 4K Ultra HD?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 30 m
- Max video resolution4K vs 5K
- Weight100 g vs 64 g+56%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 100 g | 64 g |
| Width | — | 61 mm |
| Height | — | 44 mm |
| Depth | — | 32 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 30 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 5K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 240 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 24 MP | — |
| Max field of view | — | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 90 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
