- Clippertoday
- Compare
- H5 Pro vs C300
Midland H5 Pro vs SJCAM C300
What H5 Pro does better (1) and where C300 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
H5 ProC300
| H5 Pro | C300 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 41 mm | 32 mm | +9 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 130 mm | −71 mm |
| Depth | 23 mm | 22.2 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 58 g | 31 g | +27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is H5 Pro better than C300?
- Main screen size2″ vs 1.33″+50%
Why is C300 better than H5 Pro?
- Battery life (recording)120 min vs 360 min3×
- Weight58 g vs 31 g+87%
- Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 2,800 mAh2.7×
- Photo resolution16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Max field of view120° vs 154°+28%
- Depth23 mm vs 22.2 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 58 g | 31 g |
| Width | 59 mm | 130 mm |
| Height | 41 mm | 32 mm |
| Depth | 23 mm | 22.2 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 30 m |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Min operating temperature | — | -10 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Pre-recording (HindSight / Pre-Rec) | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| Max field of view | 120° | 154° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Gyroskopischer Bildstabilisator |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 1.33″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 2,800 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | 360 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | Yes |
| Live streaming | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 128 GB |
