- Clippertoday
- Compare
- VEGA X 8K vs GO 2550 4k
Niceboy VEGA X 8K vs Trevi GO 2550 4k
What VEGA X 8K does better (5) and where GO 2550 4k wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Video4.9
9.5Photo5.2
6.7Ruggedness9.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
VEGA X 8KGO 2550 4k
| VEGA X 8K | GO 2550 4k | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 44 mm | 43 mm | +1 mm |
| Width | 61 mm | 60 mm | +1 mm |
| Depth | 32 mm | 31 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 138 g | 86 g | +52 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is VEGA X 8K better than GO 2550 4k?
- Max video resolution8K vs 4K
- 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Photo resolution64 MP vs 16 MP4×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Max field of view170° vs 145°+17%
Why is GO 2550 4k better than VEGA X 8K?
- Waterproof without case12 m vs 30 m2.5×
- Weight138 g vs 86 g+60%
- Depth32 mm vs 31 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 138 g | 86 g |
| Width | 61 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 44 mm | 43 mm |
| Depth | 32 mm | 31 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 12 m | 30 m |
| Min operating temperature | 0 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 55 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 8K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 64 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | — |
| Max field of view | 170° | 145° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 80 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
| Timecode sync | Yes | — |
