- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Mini-SE vs C300
Nilox Mini-SE vs SJCAM C300
What Mini-SE does better (2) and where C300 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is Mini-SE better than C300?
- Main screen size2″ vs 1.33″+50%
- Max field of view170° vs 154°+10%
Why is C300 better than Mini-SE?
- Weight56 g vs 31 g+81%
- Max frame rate (slow motion)30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- Battery capacity900 mAh vs 2,800 mAh3.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 56 g | 31 g |
| Width | — | 130 mm |
| Height | — | 32 mm |
| Depth | — | 22.2 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 30 m |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Min operating temperature | — | -10 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Pre-recording (HindSight / Pre-Rec) | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | — | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/2 | — |
| Max field of view | 170° | 154° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Gyroskopischer Bildstabilisator |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 1.33″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 2,800 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 360 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Live streaming | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 128 GB |
