- Clippertoday
- Compare
- NBA vs XSNAP2
Nilox NBA vs Nilox XSNAP2
What NBA does better (1) and where XSNAP2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is NBA better than XSNAP2?
- Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 900 mAh+17%
Why is XSNAP2 better than NBA?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)30 fps vs 120 fps4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 56 g |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/4" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.25″ |
| Photo resolution | — | 8 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2 |
| Max field of view | 170° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 900 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
