- Clippertoday
- Compare
- XPOCKET vs Platinum
Nilox XPOCKET vs Patona Platinum
What XPOCKET does better (2) and where Platinum wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is XPOCKET better than Platinum?
- Weight50 g vs 66 g+32%
- Main screen size2.1″ vs 2″+5%
Why is Platinum better than XPOCKET?
- 4K frame rate (max)30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- Max video resolution4K vs 5K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- Photo resolution3 MP vs 64 MP22.9×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 50 g | 66 g |
| Waterproof without case | — | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 30 m |
| Min operating temperature | — | -10 °C |
| Max operating temperature | — | 50 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 5K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/2.86" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.35″ |
| Photo resolution | 3 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2 |
| Max field of view | — | 120° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.1″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
