- Clippertoday
- Compare
- XPOCKET vs GO 2600
Nilox XPOCKET vs Trevi GO 2600
What XPOCKET does better (1) and where GO 2600 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is XPOCKET better than GO 2600?
- Main screen size2.1″ vs 2″+5%
Why is GO 2600 better than XPOCKET?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- Photo resolution3 MP vs 20 MP7.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 50 g | — |
| Waterproof without case | — | 21 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 3 MP | 20 MP |
| Max field of view | — | 140° |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.1″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
