- Clippertoday
- Compare
- XPOCKET vs 2.0 WiFi
Nilox XPOCKET vs Water Wolf 2.0 WiFi
What XPOCKET does better (1) and where 2.0 WiFi wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is XPOCKET better than 2.0 WiFi?
- Max video resolution4K vs 2.5K
Why is 2.0 WiFi better than XPOCKET?
- Battery life (recording)120 min vs 240 min2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 50 g | — |
| Waterproof without case | — | 100 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 2.5K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/3" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.33″ |
| Photo resolution | 3 MP | — |
| Aperture | — | f/2 |
| Max field of view | — | 116° |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2.1″ | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | 240 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
