- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Platinum vs 2.0 WiFi
Patona Platinum vs Water Wolf 2.0 WiFi
What Platinum does better (3) and where 2.0 WiFi wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is Platinum better than 2.0 WiFi?
- Max video resolution5K vs 2.5K
- Sensor size (optical format)0.35″ vs 0.33″+5%
- Max field of view120° vs 116°+3%
Why is 2.0 WiFi better than Platinum?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 100 m
- Battery life (recording)120 min vs 240 min2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 66 g | — |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 100 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Min operating temperature | -10 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 50 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5K | 2.5K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 120 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.86" | 1/3" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.35″ | 0.33″ |
| Photo resolution | 64 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2 | f/2 |
| Max field of view | 120° | 116° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | 240 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
