- Clippertoday
- Compare
- SL3 4K vs GO 2600
Patona SL3 4K vs Trevi GO 2600
What SL3 4K does better (3) and where GO 2600 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is SL3 4K better than GO 2600?
- 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Waterproof without case30 m vs 21 m+43%
- Main screen size3″ vs 2″+50%
Why is GO 2600 better than SL3 4K?
- Photo resolution16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Waterproof without case | 30 m | 21 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | — |
| Max field of view | 140° | 140° |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 3″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
