- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AT907 vs GO 2600
Pora&Co AT907 vs Trevi GO 2600
What AT907 does better (0) and where GO 2600 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is AT907 better than GO 2600?
AT907 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is GO 2600 better than AT907?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)30 fps vs 120 fps4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Waterproof without case | — | 21 m |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | — | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/2 | — |
| Max field of view | — | 140° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
