- Clippertoday
- Compare
- DV800 vs SJ11 Active
Prixton DV800 vs SJCAM SJ11 Active
What DV800 does better (3) and where SJ11 Active wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Video6.4
9.6Ruggedness9.6
4.4Battery8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
DV800SJ11 Active
| DV800 | SJ11 Active | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 44 mm | 44.5 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Width | 61 mm | 64.5 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Depth | 32 mm | 30.5 mm | +1.5 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is DV800 better than SJ11 Active?
- Max video resolution5K vs 4K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 60 fps4×
- Max field of view170° vs 154°+10%
Why is SJ11 Active better than DV800?
- Battery life (recording)90 min vs 140 min+56%
- Main screen size2″ vs 2.33″+17%
- Depth32 mm vs 30.5 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 64 g | — |
| Width | 61 mm | 64.5 mm |
| Height | 44 mm | 44.5 mm |
| Depth | 32 mm | 30.5 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 30 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 5K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 60 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | — | 12 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.3 |
| Max field of view | 170° | 154° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Gyroskopischer Bildstabilisator |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2.33″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,300 mAh |
| Battery energy | — | 4.9 Wh |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | 140 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Live streaming | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | — | Yes |
