- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AC4K 120 vs 372
Renkforce AC4K 120 vs Rollei 372
What AC4K 120 does better (4) and where 372 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
AC4K 120372
| AC4K 120 | 372 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 41 mm | 41.8 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 60 mm | −1 mm |
| Depth | 24.5 mm | 30.4 mm | −5.9 mm |
| Weight | 64 g | 60 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is AC4K 120 better than 372?
- Battery life (recording)180 min vs 80 min2.2×
- Max video resolution4K vs 720p
- Photo resolution2 MP vs 1 MP2×
- Depth24.5 mm vs 30.4 mm+24%
Why is 372 better than AC4K 120?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)10 fps vs 30 fps3×
- Weight64 g vs 60 g+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 64 g | 60 g |
| Width | 59 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 41 mm | 41.8 mm |
| Depth | 24.5 mm | 30.4 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 720p |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 10 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 10 fps | 30 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 2 MP | 1 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/3 |
| Max field of view | 140° | 140° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 900 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 180 min | 80 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
