- Clippertoday
- Compare
- 9S Plus vs Muvi KX-1
Rollei 9S Plus vs Veho Muvi KX-1
What 9S Plus does better (3) and where Muvi KX-1 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
9S PlusMuvi KX-1
| 9S Plus | Muvi KX-1 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 43.8 mm | 40 mm | +3.8 mm |
| Width | 65.5 mm | 52 mm | +13.5 mm |
| Depth | 26.5 mm | 26 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 129 g | 67 g | +62 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 9S Plus better than Muvi KX-1?
- 4K frame rate (max)60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 60 fps4×
- Main screen size2″ vs 1.8″+11%
Why is Muvi KX-1 better than 9S Plus?
- Weight129 g vs 67 g+93%
- Waterproof with housing10 m vs 40 m4×
- Photo resolution9 MP vs 12 MP+41%
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,050 mAh+5%
- Aperturef/2.8 vs f/2.5+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 129 g | 67 g |
| Width | 65.5 mm | 52 mm |
| Height | 43.8 mm | 40 mm |
| Depth | 26.5 mm | 26 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 10 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 60 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.4″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 9 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.5 |
| Max field of view | — | 140° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 1.8″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 85 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
