- Clippertoday
- Compare
- A50 vs 2.0 WiFi
SJCAM A50 vs Water Wolf 2.0 WiFi
What A50 does better (1) and where 2.0 WiFi wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is A50 better than 2.0 WiFi?
- Max field of view135° vs 116°+16%
Why is 2.0 WiFi better than A50?
- Aperturef/3 vs f/2+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Waterproof without case | — | 100 m |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 2.5K | 2.5K |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/3" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.33″ |
| Aperture | f/3 | f/2 |
| Max field of view | 135° | 116° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 240 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | — | Yes |
