- Clippertoday
- Compare
- C100 Pro vs GO 2550 4k
SJCAM C100 Pro vs Trevi GO 2550 4k
What C100 Pro does better (2) and where GO 2550 4k wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.0Video4.9
5.8Photo5.2
4.2Ruggedness9.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
C100 ProGO 2550 4k
| C100 Pro | GO 2550 4k | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 20 mm | 43 mm | −23 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 60 mm | = |
| Depth | 26 mm | 31 mm | −5 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C100 Pro better than GO 2550 4k?
- Photo resolution20 MP vs 16 MP+25%
- Depth26 mm vs 31 mm+19%
Why is GO 2550 4k better than C100 Pro?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 30 m
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Max field of view120° vs 145°+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 86 g |
| Width | 60 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 20 mm | 43 mm |
| Depth | 26 mm | 31 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 30 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 16 MP |
| Max field of view | 120° | 145° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | — | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (recording) | 148 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
| Max memory card | 512 GB | — |
