- Clippertoday
- Compare
- C100 vs C400
SJCAM C100 vs SJCAM C400
What C100 does better (2) and where C400 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
C100C400
| C100 | C400 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 26 mm | 32 mm | −6 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 68 mm | −8 mm |
| Depth | 20 mm | 25.5 mm | −5.5 mm |
| Weight | 40 g | 54 g | −14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C100 better than C400?
- Weight40 g vs 54 g+35%
- Depth20 mm vs 25.5 mm+27%
Why is C400 better than C100?
- Battery energy2.7 Wh vs 4.8 Wh+76%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 40 g | 54 g |
| Width | 60 mm | 68 mm |
| Height | 26 mm | 32 mm |
| Depth | 20 mm | 25.5 mm |
| Waterproof without case | — | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Pre-recording (HindSight / Pre-Rec) | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/2.8" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.36″ |
| Photo resolution | — | 16 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2 |
| Max field of view | — | 154° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | 6-Achsen Stabilisation, HorizonSteady |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| 360° horizon lock | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | — | 2.29″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,250 mAh |
| Battery energy | 2.7 Wh | 4.8 Wh |
| Battery life (recording) | 150 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Live streaming | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 512 GB |
