- Clippertoday
- Compare
- C200 Pro vs C400 Pocket
SJCAM C200 Pro vs SJCAM C400 Pocket
What C200 Pro does better (3) and where C400 Pocket wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Video6.8
8.0Photo3.4
6.6Ruggedness4.0
5.3Battery7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
C200 ProC400 Pocket
| C200 Pro | C400 Pocket | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 34 mm | 32.1 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Width | 68 mm | 68.5 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Depth | 26.5 mm | 25.5 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 78 g | 54 g | +24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C200 Pro better than C400 Pocket?
- Waterproof without case5 m vs 0 m
- Photo resolution20 MP vs 16 MP+25%
- Aperturef/1.6 vs f/3+88%
Why is C400 Pocket better than C200 Pro?
- Weight78 g vs 54 g+44%
- Battery life (recording)120 min vs 170 min+42%
- Battery capacity1,200 mAh vs 1,250 mAh+4%
- Depth26.5 mm vs 25.5 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 78 g | 54 g |
| Width | 68 mm | 68.5 mm |
| Height | 34 mm | 32.1 mm |
| Depth | 26.5 mm | 25.5 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 5 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| HDR video | Yes | — |
| H.265 / HEVC | Yes | — |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Pre-recording (HindSight / Pre-Rec) | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/3 |
| Max field of view | 135° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 1.3″ | 1.3″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,200 mAh | 1,250 mAh |
| Battery energy | 4.6 Wh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 120 min | 170 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
