- Clippertoday
- Compare
- C200 vs C300 Pocket
SJCAM C200 vs SJCAM C300 Pocket
What C200 does better (2) and where C300 Pocket wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.5Video6.8
2.2Photo7.3
7.6Ruggedness4.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
C200C300 Pocket
| C200 | C300 Pocket | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 34 mm | 32.1 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Width | 68 mm | 68.5 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Depth | 26.5 mm | 25.5 mm | +1 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C200 better than C300 Pocket?
- Waterproof without case5 m vs 0 m
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 120 fps2×
Why is C300 Pocket better than C200?
- 4K frame rate (max)24 fps vs 30 fps+25%
- Main screen size1.28″ vs 1.33″+4%
- Depth26.5 mm vs 25.5 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 31 g |
| Width | 68 mm | 68.5 mm |
| Height | 34 mm | 32.1 mm |
| Depth | 26.5 mm | 25.5 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 5 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 30 m |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Min operating temperature | -20 °C | — |
| Max operating temperature | 60 °C | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 24 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 120 fps |
| H.265 / HEVC | — | Yes |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Pre-recording (HindSight / Pre-Rec) | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.8" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.36″ | — |
| Photo resolution | — | 20 MP |
| Max field of view | 154° | 154° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation | Gyroskopischer Bildstabilisator |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 1.28″ | 1.33″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 2,800 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | Yes |
| Live streaming | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
