- Clippertoday
- Compare
- SF630 vs GA320
Surfola SF630 vs WOLFANG GA320
What SF630 does better (2) and where GA320 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is SF630 better than GA320?
- Waterproof without case10 m vs 0 m
- Battery capacity1,350 mAh vs 1,050 mAh+29%
Why is GA320 better than SF630?
GA320 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Waterproof without case | 10 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 24 MP | 24 MP |
| Max field of view | — | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation | 6-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
