- Clippertoday
- Compare
- GO 2600 vs GA100
Trevi GO 2600 vs WOLFANG GA100
What GO 2600 does better (2) and where GA100 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is GO 2600 better than GA100?
- Waterproof without case21 m vs 0 m
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 30 fps4×
Why is GA100 better than GO 2600?
- Max field of view140° vs 170°+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Waterproof without case | 21 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 30 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 20 MP |
| Max field of view | 140° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | 3-Achsen Stabilisation |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,050 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | — | Yes |
