- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X-12 PRO vs X3.2
AAAmaze X-12 PRO vs Lamax X3.2
What X-12 PRO does better (1) and where X3.2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is X-12 PRO better than X3.2?
- Max video resolution4K vs 2.7K
Why is X3.2 better than X-12 PRO?
- Weight500 g vs 65 g7.7×
- Battery life (recording)80 min vs 135 min+69%
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Waterproof with housing21 m vs 40 m+90%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 500 g | 65 g |
| Width | — | 60 mm |
| Height | — | 44 mm |
| Depth | — | 33 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | — |
| Waterproof with housing | 21 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 2.7K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | — | 12 MP |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Digitale Bildstabilisierung (DIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,200 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 80 min | 135 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 128 GB |
