- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X-12 PRO vs AT-M82TR 6K
AAAmaze X-12 PRO vs Lipa AT-M82TR 6K
What X-12 PRO does better (0) and where AT-M82TR 6K wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Video8.9
4.2Ruggedness4.2
3.5Battery5.6
Why is X-12 PRO better than AT-M82TR 6K?
X-12 PRO has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is AT-M82TR 6K better than X-12 PRO?
- Max video resolution4K vs 6K
- Weight500 g vs 300 g+67%
- Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Battery life (recording)80 min vs 90 min+12%
- Waterproof with housing21 m vs 30 m+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 500 g | 300 g |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 21 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 6K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | — | 50 MP |
| Max field of view | — | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Digitale Bildstabilisierung (DIS) | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,350 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 80 min | 90 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
