- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AC9000 vs X35
AgfaPhoto AC9000 vs Campark X35
What AC9000 does better (0) and where X35 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is AC9000 better than X35?
AC9000 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is X35 better than AC9000?
- Photo resolution16 MP vs 24 MP+50%
- Waterproof with housing30 m vs 40 m+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 76 g | — |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | — | 240 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 16 MP | 24 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 90 min |
| Removable battery | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | — | Yes |
