- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AC9000 vs X40
AgfaPhoto AC9000 vs Campark X40
What AC9000 does better (0) and where X40 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is AC9000 better than X40?
AC9000 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is X40 better than AC9000?
- Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 1,350 mAh+29%
- Photo resolution16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Waterproof with housing30 m vs 40 m+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 76 g | — |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | — | 240 fps |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation | 6-axis gyroscope |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 1,350 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | — | Yes |
