LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 865Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. X40 vs Full HD Pro WiFi V2

Campark X40 vs Jamara Full HD Pro WiFi V2

What X40 does better (5) and where Full HD Pro WiFi V2 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Campark X40
Campark · 2020X40
5.7Score
5 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
vs
Jamara Full HD Pro WiFi V2
Jamara · 2021Full HD Pro WiFi V2
5.6Score
0 advantages≈ $85
4.2Ruggedness4.2

Why is X40 better than Full HD Pro WiFi V2?

  1. Max video resolution4K vs 1080p
  2. Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 120 fps2×
  3. Battery capacity1,350 mAh vs 900 mAh+50%
  4. Photo resolution20 MP vs 16 MP+25%
  5. Waterproof with housing40 m vs 30 m+33%

Why is Full HD Pro WiFi V2 better than X40?

Full HD Pro WiFi V2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Campark X40Campark X40≈ $755.7
Design & durability
Weight—58 g
Width—84 mm
Height—55 mm
Depth—86 mm
Waterproof without case0 m0 m
Waterproof with housing40 m30 m
Video
Max video resolution4K1080p
4K frame rate (max)30 fps—
Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps120 fps
Sensor & photo
Photo resolution20 MP16 MP
Max field of view—170°
Stabilisation
Stabilisation system6-axis gyroscope—
Electronic image stabilisationYes—
Screens
Front screenYes—
Main screen size2″2″
TouchscreenYes—
Battery
Battery capacity1,350 mAh900 mAh
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
Storage & features
microSD card slotYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare