- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AC9000 vs X7.2
AgfaPhoto AC9000 vs Lamax X7.2
What AC9000 does better (0) and where X7.2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is AC9000 better than X7.2?
AC9000 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is X7.2 better than AC9000?
- Weight76 g vs 65 g+17%
- Waterproof with housing30 m vs 40 m+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 76 g | 65 g |
| Width | — | 60 mm |
| Height | — | 44 mm |
| Depth | — | 33 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | — | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | — | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 128 GB |
