- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AC9000 vs H3
AgfaPhoto AC9000 vs Midland H3
What AC9000 does better (3) and where H3 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is AC9000 better than H3?
- Max video resolution4K vs 1080p
- Battery capacity1,050 mAh vs 900 mAh+17%
- Max field of view170° vs 120°+42%
Why is H3 better than AC9000?
- Weight76 g vs 53 g+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 76 g | 53 g |
| Width | — | 59.3 mm |
| Height | — | 29.3 mm |
| Depth | — | 41.1 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 1080p |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | 120° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-Achsen Stabilisation | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | 900 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | — | Yes |
