- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Realimove MC3X vs V50 X Cube
AgfaPhoto Realimove MC3X vs AKASO V50 X Cube
What Realimove MC3X does better (2) and where V50 X Cube wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Video3.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Realimove MC3XV50 X Cube
| Realimove MC3X | V50 X Cube | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 157 mm | 45 mm | +112 mm |
| Width | 56 mm | 53.7 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Depth | 45 mm | 37.9 mm | +7.1 mm |
| Weight | 220 g | 100 g | +120 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Realimove MC3X better than V50 X Cube?
- Main screen size3.5″ vs 2.1″+67%
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 1,050 mAh+38%
Why is V50 X Cube better than Realimove MC3X?
- Weight220 g vs 100 g2.2×
- Photo resolution8 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
- Depth45 mm vs 37.9 mm+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 220 g | 100 g |
| Width | 56 mm | 53.7 mm |
| Height | 157 mm | 45 mm |
| Depth | 45 mm | 37.9 mm |
| Waterproof without case | — | 21 m |
| Min operating temperature | — | -5 °C |
| Max operating temperature | — | 45 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.4″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 8 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | — |
| Max field of view | 120° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 3-Achsen Stabilisation | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 3.5″ | 2.1″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Timecode sync | — | Yes |
