- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Realimove MC3X vs Vision DUO
AgfaPhoto Realimove MC3X vs Easypix Vision DUO
What Realimove MC3X does better (2) and where Vision DUO wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Video7.3
3.2Photo5.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Realimove MC3XVision DUO
| Realimove MC3X | Vision DUO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 157 mm | 43 mm | +114 mm |
| Width | 56 mm | 60 mm | −4 mm |
| Depth | 45 mm | 31 mm | +14 mm |
| Weight | 220 g | 68 g | +152 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Realimove MC3X better than Vision DUO?
- Main screen size3.5″ vs 2″+75%
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 1,050 mAh+38%
Why is Vision DUO better than Realimove MC3X?
- Weight220 g vs 68 g3.2×
- 4K frame rate (max)30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Max frame rate (slow motion)30 fps vs 120 fps4×
- Photo resolution8 MP vs 12 MP+50%
- Depth45 mm vs 31 mm+45%
- Max field of view120° vs 170°+42%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 220 g | 68 g |
| Width | 56 mm | 60 mm |
| Height | 157 mm | 43 mm |
| Depth | 45 mm | 31 mm |
| Waterproof without case | — | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.4″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | — |
| Max field of view | 120° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 3-Achsen Stabilisation | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 3.5″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
