- Clippertoday
- Compare
- Realimove MC3X vs W9.2
AgfaPhoto Realimove MC3X vs Lamax W9.2
What Realimove MC3X does better (2) and where W9.2 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Video6.4
3.2Photo5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Realimove MC3XW9.2
| Realimove MC3X | W9.2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 157 mm | 42 mm | +115 mm |
| Width | 56 mm | 64 mm | −8 mm |
| Depth | 45 mm | 32 mm | +13 mm |
| Weight | 220 g | 127 g | +93 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Realimove MC3X better than W9.2?
- Main screen size3.5″ vs 2″+75%
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 1,350 mAh+7%
Why is W9.2 better than Realimove MC3X?
- 4K frame rate (max)30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Photo resolution8 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
- Weight220 g vs 127 g+73%
- Max frame rate (slow motion)30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Depth45 mm vs 32 mm+41%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 220 g | 127 g |
| Width | 56 mm | 64 mm |
| Height | 157 mm | 42 mm |
| Depth | 45 mm | 32 mm |
| Waterproof without case | — | 12 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | — |
| Sensor size (optical format) | 0.4″ | — |
| Photo resolution | 8 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | — |
| Max field of view | 120° | 120° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 3-Achsen Stabilisation | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 3.5″ | 2″ |
| Front screen size | — | 1.4″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,350 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 120 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 128 GB |
