- Clippertoday
- Compare
- V50 PRO vs HERO
AKASO V50 PRO vs GoPro HERO
What V50 PRO does better (3) and where HERO wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
V50 PROHERO
| V50 PRO | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 41.1 mm | 47.7 mm | −6.6 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 56.6 mm | +3.4 mm |
| Depth | 31.7 mm | 29.4 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Weight | 83 g | 86 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V50 PRO better than HERO?
- Max video resolution4K vs 1080p
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Weight83 g vs 86 g+4%
Why is HERO better than V50 PRO?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 10 m
- Battery life (recording)90 min vs 123 min+37%
- Aperturef/2.8 vs f/2.3+22%
- Depth31.7 mm vs 29.4 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 83 g | 86 g |
| Width | 60 mm | 56.6 mm |
| Height | 41.1 mm | 47.7 mm |
| Depth | 31.7 mm | 29.4 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 10 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | — |
| Min operating temperature | — | -10 °C |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 14 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.3 |
| Max field of view | 170° | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | Digitale Bildstabilisierung (DIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | — | Yes |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Microphones | — | 2 |
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,100 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | 123 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | — | Yes |
| Voice control | — | Yes |
