- Clippertoday
- Compare
- V50 PRO vs Muvi KX-1
AKASO V50 PRO vs Veho Muvi KX-1
What V50 PRO does better (5) and where Muvi KX-1 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
V50 PROMuvi KX-1
| V50 PRO | Muvi KX-1 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 41.1 mm | 40 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Width | 60 mm | 52 mm | +8 mm |
| Depth | 31.7 mm | 26 mm | +5.7 mm |
| Weight | 83 g | 67 g | +16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V50 PRO better than Muvi KX-1?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Photo resolution14 MP vs 12 MP+19%
- Main screen size2″ vs 1.8″+11%
- Battery capacity1,100 mAh vs 1,050 mAh+5%
- Max field of view170° vs 140°+21%
Why is Muvi KX-1 better than V50 PRO?
- Weight83 g vs 67 g+24%
- Waterproof with housing30 m vs 40 m+33%
- Depth31.7 mm vs 26 mm+22%
- Aperturef/2.8 vs f/2.5+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 83 g | 67 g |
| Width | 60 mm | 52 mm |
| Height | 41.1 mm | 40 mm |
| Depth | 31.7 mm | 26 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 30 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 14 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.5 |
| Max field of view | 170° | 140° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Main screen size | 2″ | 1.8″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,100 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | — | Yes |
