- Clippertoday
- Compare
- V9H vs ACW-5054
Botslab V9H vs Denver ACW-5054
What V9H does better (1) and where ACW-5054 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is V9H better than ACW-5054?
- Max video resolution4K vs 1080p
Why is ACW-5054 better than V9H?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)20 fps vs 60 fps3×
- Photo resolution5 MP vs 12 MP2.4×
- Main screen size1″ vs 2″2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Waterproof without case | — | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 20 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 20 fps | 60 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Sensor size | — | 1/1.3" |
| Sensor size (optical format) | — | 0.77″ |
| Photo resolution | 5 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2 | — |
| Max field of view | — | 140° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 1″ | 2″ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Timecode sync | Yes | — |
