- Clippertoday
- Compare
- V9H vs X3.2
Botslab V9H vs Lamax X3.2
What V9H does better (1) and where X3.2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is V9H better than X3.2?
- Max video resolution4K vs 2.7K
Why is X3.2 better than V9H?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)20 fps vs 120 fps6×
- Photo resolution5 MP vs 12 MP2.4×
- Main screen size1″ vs 2″2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 65 g |
| Width | — | 60 mm |
| Height | — | 44 mm |
| Depth | — | 33 mm |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 2.7K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 20 fps | — |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 20 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 5 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2 | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 1″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 1,200 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 135 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Max memory card | — | 128 GB |
| Timecode sync | Yes | — |
