- Clippertoday
- Compare
- AC09 vs AT-M82TR 6K
Campark AC09 vs Lipa AT-M82TR 6K
What AC09 does better (2) and where AT-M82TR 6K wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is AC09 better than AT-M82TR 6K?
- Battery capacity1,700 mAh vs 1,350 mAh+26%
- Photo resolution56 MP vs 50 MP+12%
Why is AT-M82TR 6K better than AC09?
- Max video resolution4K vs 6K
- Max frame rate (slow motion)30 fps vs 120 fps4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 300 g |
| Waterproof without case | — | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | — | 30 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 6K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | — | 60 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 30 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | — | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 56 MP | 50 MP |
| Max field of view | — | 170° |
| Lenses | 2 | — |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | — | Elektronischer Bildstabilisator (EIS) |
| Electronic image stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 3″ | — |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,700 mAh | 1,350 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 90 min |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam mode | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | — | Yes |
| Max memory card | 128 GB | — |
