- Clippertoday
- Compare
- V40 vs X35
Campark V40 vs Campark X35
What V40 does better (1) and where X35 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is V40 better than X35?
- Battery capacity1,350 mAh vs 1,050 mAh+29%
Why is X35 better than V40?
- Main screen size1.2″ vs 2″+67%
- Photo resolution20 MP vs 24 MP+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 0 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | 40 m |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 240 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 20 MP | 24 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | 170° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Stabilisation system | 6-axis gyroscope | — |
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | Yes |
| Main screen size | 1.2″ | 2″ |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Audio | ||
| External microphone support | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,350 mAh | 1,050 mAh |
| Battery life (recording) | — | 90 min |
| Removable battery | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | Yes |
