- Clippertoday
- Compare
- X35 vs GO 2550 4k
Campark X35 vs Trevi GO 2550 4k
What X35 does better (3) and where GO 2550 4k wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Video4.9
9.4Photo5.2
4.2Ruggedness9.6
Why is X35 better than GO 2550 4k?
- Max frame rate (slow motion)240 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Photo resolution24 MP vs 16 MP+50%
- Max field of view170° vs 145°+17%
Why is GO 2550 4k better than X35?
- Waterproof without case0 m vs 30 m
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 86 g |
| Width | — | 60 mm |
| Height | — | 43 mm |
| Depth | — | 31 mm |
| Waterproof without case | 0 m | 30 m |
| Waterproof with housing | 40 m | — |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K frame rate (max) | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Max frame rate (slow motion) | 240 fps | 120 fps |
| Timelapse / hyperlapse | Yes | — |
| Sensor & photo | ||
| Photo resolution | 24 MP | 16 MP |
| Max field of view | 170° | 145° |
| Stabilisation | ||
| Electronic image stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Screens | ||
| Front screen | Yes | — |
| Main screen size | 2″ | 2″ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,050 mAh | — |
| Battery life (recording) | 90 min | — |
| Removable battery | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Storage & features | ||
| microSD card slot | Yes | — |
