LIVE240 modelsBrands 68Comparisons 867Oct 21, 2026RankingsAdvertise
clippertoday.com
  1. Clippertoday
  2. Compare
  3. ACK-8064 vs SJ4000 Dual Screen

Denver ACK-8064 vs SJCAM SJ4000 Dual Screen

What ACK-8064 does better (1) and where SJ4000 Dual Screen wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Denver ACK-8064
Denver · 2024ACK-8064
4.0Score
1 advantage≈ $40
vs
SJCAM SJ4000 Dual Screen
SJCAM · 2023SJ4000 Dual Screen
5.8Score
4 advantages≈ $45
Higher score
4.0Video4.9
2.3Photo6.6
4.2Ruggedness4.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

ACK-8064SJ4000 Dual Screen
78 × 584629.8 × 59.241
ACK-8064SJ4000 Dual ScreenDifference
Height58 mm59.2 mm−1.2 mm
Width78 mm29.8 mm+48.2 mm
Depth46 mm41 mm+5 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ACK-8064 better than SJ4000 Dual Screen?

  1. Waterproof with housing40 m vs 30 m+33%

Why is SJ4000 Dual Screen better than ACK-8064?

  1. Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps vs 120 fps2×
  2. Photo resolution8 MP vs 16 MP2×
  3. Max field of view140° vs 170°+21%
  4. Depth46 mm vs 41 mm+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Denver ACK-8064Denver ACK-8064≈ $404.0
Design & durability
Width78 mm29.8 mm
Height58 mm59.2 mm
Depth46 mm41 mm
Waterproof without case0 m0 m
Waterproof with housing40 m30 m
Video
Max video resolution4K4K
4K frame rate (max)30 fps30 fps
Max frame rate (slow motion)60 fps120 fps
H.265 / HEVC—Yes
Timelapse / hyperlapseYesYes
Sensor & photo
Photo resolution8 MP16 MP
Max field of view140°170°
Screens
Front screen—Yes
Main screen size2″—
Touchscreen—Yes
Audio
External microphone support—Yes
Battery
Battery capacity—900 mAh
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYes—
Webcam mode—Yes
Storage & features
microSD card slot—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare